Case Study

Eviction application · Ajax · TEL-18756-21

Ontario LTB order in Ajax · Dismissed

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: Not Available

Order Issued: Not Available

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: TEL-18756-21
Address: 10 Milham Drive (Basement Apt.), Ajax, ON L1S7S1
Form Used: N7
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Eviction application
RTA Sections: Section 69

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Hina setia and Sagar setia
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Paige toye and Rhonda toye and Karen mourant
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Harry Cho
Keywords: eviction

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction application — was dismissed.

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The Landlords' application is dismissed. 2021 CanLII 147622 (ON LTB) Order Page 2 of 2 File Number: TEL-18756-21 November 17, 2021 Date Issued Harry Cho Member, Landlord and Tenant Board Toronto East-RO 2275 Midland Avenue, Unit 2 Toronto ON M1P3E7

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Paige Toye, Rhonda Toye and Karen Mourant (the 'Tenants') because they, another occupant of the rental unit or a person the Tenants permitted in the residential complex have seriously impaired the safety of any person. The Landlords also claimed compensation for each day the Tenants remained in the unit after the termination date as well as NSF cheque charges. This application was heard in video conference room 104 on November 4, 2021.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Harry Cho

📂 Related by application type

Eviction application