Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · Other · EAL-96975-21

Ontario LTB order in Other · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: November 17, 2021

Order Issued: Not Available

Termination Date: January 22, 2022

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: EAL-96975-21
Address: 1906, 20 thomas riley road, etobicoke, on m9b0c3
Form Used: N5
Amount Awarded: $201.00
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 68, Section 83

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Kaushal kapasi
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Rose oria
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Khalid Akram
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated, as of January 22, 2022. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before January 22, 2022. 2. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord $201.00 for the cost of filing the application. 3. If the Tenant does not pay the Landlord the full amount owing on or before January 22, 2022, the Tenant will start to owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from January 23, 2022 at 2.00% annually on the balance outstanding. 4. If the unit is not vacated on or before January 22, 2022, then starting January 23, 2022, the Landlord may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be enforced. 5. Upon receipt of this order, the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) is directed to give vacant possession of the unit to the Landlord on or after January 23, 2022. January 11, 2022 Date Issued Khalid Akram Member, Landlord and Tenant Board Eastern-RO 255 Albert Street, 4th Floor Ottawa ON K1P6A9

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Rose Oria (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. This application was heard by videoconference on November 17, 2021.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Khalid Akram

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment