Case Study

Tenant rights application · Other · LTB-T-100270-23-IN

Ontario LTB order in Other · December 27, 2023 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: Not Available

Order Issued: December 27, 2023

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-100270-23-IN
Address: Green Cottage, 1247 County Road 2 Maitland ON K0E1P0
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded:
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Tenant rights application
RTA Sections: Section 16.1

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Sprucelawn RMD Corporation
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Debbie Rawley
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Robert Patchett
Keywords: tenant rights

⚖️ Decision summary

This Tenant application — Tenant rights application — was granted.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The Board shall schedule this application for a video hearing on an expedited basis. 2. The Landlord shall not re- rent the rental unit until this application is resolved or the Board orders otherwise. Nothing in this order prevents the Landlord from restoring the Tenancy in the absence of a hearing or Board order. File Number: LTB-T-100270-23-IN Order Page 2 of 2 3. The Landlord shall preserve and keep safe any property belonging to the Tenant that is in the Landlords’ control. Nothing in this order prevents the Landlord from giving to the Tenant any of their possessions at the request of the Tenants. 4. The initial and primary focus of the expedited hearing shall be on the T2 application allegation that the Tenant has been illegally locked out. 5. The remaining issues raised in the applications may be addressed at the hearing at the discretion of the Presiding Member if adequate disclosure has been provided and time permits. 6. The parties will have until not later than 2 days prior to the hearing to give to the other and file with the Board a copy of any documents, receipts, photographs, recordings or like things the party intends to rely on at the hearing. All submissions must be uploaded on the Tribunals Ontario Portal (TOP) online. It may also be submitted via email at [email protected] where the TOP precludes uploading large documents. 7. The parties may also consent in writing to exchange of documents using the online TOP portal. 8. Pursuant to Rule 19.7 a party who fails to comply with an order for disclosure may not be permitted to rel...

💡 Summary points

applied for an order determining that Sprucelawn RMD Corporation (the 'Landlord') the Landlords' superintendent or the Landlords' agent, altered the locking system on a door giving entry to the rental unit or residential complex without giving the Tenant replacement keys. It is determined that: 1. The Tenant alleges that they have been illegally locked out of the rental unit. 2. An order shall issue to preserve the tenancy pending a determination of the issues. 3. The Tenant also requested a shorten time to a hearing which is granted.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Robert Patchett

📂 Related by application type

Tenant rights application