Case Study

Rent deposit application · Toronto · LTB-L029857-22

Ontario LTB order in Toronto · March 22, 2023 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: March 9, 2023

Order Issued: March 22, 2023

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L029857-22
Address: 306 dawlish avenue, toronto on m4n1j5
Amount Awarded: $5,984.06
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Rent deposit application
RTA Sections:

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Wen hua zhang
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Ching ching wong and Wai-ping lee
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Michael Di Salle
Keywords: rent deposit

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Rent deposit application — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The Former Tenants shall pay to the Landlord $5,648.92, which represents rent and compensation owing up to November 2, 2021. 2. The Former Tenants shall also pay to the Landlord $134.14, which represents the reasonable out-of-pocket expenses the Landlord incurred as a result of the unpaid utility costs. File Number: LTB-L029857-22 Order Page 3 of 3 3. The Former Tenants shall also pay to the Landlord $201.00 for the cost of filing the application. 4. If the Former Tenants do not pay the Landlord the full amount owing on or before April 2, 2023, the Former Tenants will start to owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from April 3, 2023, at 5% annually on the balance outstanding. March 22, 2023 _______________________ Date Issued Michael Di Salle Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order requiring Ching Ching Wong and Wai-Ping Lee (the 'Former Tenants') to pay the rent and daily compensation that the Former Tenants owe. The Landlord also applied for an order requiring the Former Tenants to pay the Landlord’s reasonable out-of-pocket costs that are the result of the Former Tenants’ failure to pay utility costs they were required to pay under the terms of the tenancy agreement. This application was heard by videoconference on March 9, 2023.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Michael Di Salle

📂 Related by application type

Rent deposit application