Case Study

Eviction for non-payment of rent · Other · SOL-15939-20

Ontario LTB order in Other · Withdrawn

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: Not Available

Order Issued: Not Available

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: SOL-15939-20
Address: 121 queen street, dunnville, on n1a 1h6
Amount Awarded: $6,211.48
Decision In Favor: Withdrawn — no decision
Application Type: Eviction for non-payment of rent
RTA Sections: Section 69

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: John sparkes and Rachael sparkes
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Josiah mcwilliam
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Trish Carson
Keywords: eviction, non-payment of rent, interference with reasonable enjoyment, rent deposit, rent arrears

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction for non-payment of rent — was withdrawn and the file closed.

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The tenancy is terminated as of November 30, 2020, the date the Tenant gave vacant possession of the rental unit to the Landlord. 2. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlords $6,010.48*, which represents the amount of rent owing and compensation up to November 30, 2020, less the rent deposit and interest the Landlords owe on the rent deposit. 3. The Tenant shall also pay to the Landlords $201.00 for the cost of filing the application. 4. If the Tenant does not pay the Landlords the full amount owing* on or before November 13, 2021, the Tenant will start to owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from November 14, 2021 at 2.00% annually on the balance outstanding. November 2, 2021 Date Issued Trish Carson Member, Landlord and Tenant Board Southern-RO 119 King Street West, 6th Floor Hamilton ON L8P4Y7

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Josiah McWilliam (the 'Tenant') because: a) the Tenant did not pay the rent that the Tenant owes (L1 Application) and; b) because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination. This application was heard by way of video conference at 9:00 am on October 20, 2021.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Trish Carson

📂 Related by application type

Eviction for non-payment of rent