Case Study

Eviction — Damage to property · Other · TEL-11939-20

Ontario LTB order in Other · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: Not Available

Order Issued: Not Available

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: TEL-11939-20
Address: 121 thicketwood drive scarborough, on m1j2a2
Form Used: N7
Amount Awarded: $919.03
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Damage to property
RTA Sections: Section 69

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Evelyn church
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: David morris
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Jana Rozehnal
Keywords: eviction, damage to property, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Damage to property — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated effective July 18, 2020. 2. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord $919.03, which represents the reasonable costs of repairing the damage ($850.00) and compensation for the use of the unit from July 16, 2020 to July 18, 2020 ($69.03). 3. If the Tenant does not pay the Landlord the full amount owing on or before June 30, 2021, the Tenant will start to owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from July 1, 2021 at 2.00% annually on the balance outstanding. June 16, 2021 Date Issued Jana Rozehnal Member, Landlord and Tenant Board Toronto East-RO 2275 Midland Avenue, Unit 2 Toronto ON M1P3E7

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The Landlord further applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict the Tenant because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or a person the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has seriously impaired the safety of any person. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date. This application was heard by video/teleconference on June 8, 2021.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Jana Rozehnal

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Damage to property