Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · Thunder Bay · LTB-L-026384-24

Ontario LTB order in Thunder Bay · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: August 12, 2024

Order Issued: Not Available

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-026384-24
Address: 101, 210 LELAND AVE S THUNDER BAY ON P7E2N5
Form Used: N5
Served By:
Amount Awarded:
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 78

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Quadera Limited
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Chelsea Hamilton
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Mark Melchers
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was granted.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant continues if the Tenant meets the condition set out below. 2. For a period of 12 months beginning on August 28, 2024, the Tenant shall not smoke any substance, including tobacco, in the rental unit, and shall not permit any of her guests or occupants to do so. 3. If the Tenant fails to comply with the condition set out in paragraph 2 of this order, the Landlord may apply under section 78 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the ‘Act') for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant. The Landlord must make the application within 30 days of a breach of a condition. This application is made to the LTB without notice to the Tenant. August 27, 2024 Date Issued Mark Melchers Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor, 2024 ONLTB 62139 (CanLII) File Number: LTB-L-026384-24 Order Page 5 of 5 Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Chelsea Hamilton (the 'Tenant') because: • the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date. This application was heard by videoconference on August 12, 2024.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Mark Melchers

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment