Case Study

Eviction — Rent deposit · Toronto · LTB-L-009103-26

Ontario LTB order in Toronto · April 7, 2026 · Consent

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: March 26, 2026

Order Issued: April 7, 2026

Termination Date: June 20, 2026

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-009103-26
Address: 41 CHELTENHAM AVE, TORONTO, ON M4N1P6
Form Used: N13
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $230.14
Decision In Favor: Resolved by consent
Application Type: Eviction — Rent deposit
RTA Sections: Section 69

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Adeleh Andalib and Mehrdad Meshkati
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Antoine Adams and Marie Adams
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Rachel Gibbons
Keywords: eviction, rent deposit

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Rent deposit — was resolved by a consent order between the parties.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

it is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlords and the Tenants is terminated, effective June 20, 2026. The Tenants must move out of the rental unit on or before June 20, 2026. 2. If the unit is not vacated on or before June 20, 2026, then starting June 21, 2026, the Landlords may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be enforced. 3. The Tenants shall pay the Landlords compensation of $230.14 per day for the use of the unit starting June 21, 2026 until the date the Tenants move out of the unit. 4. Upon receipt of this order, the Sheriff is directed to give vacant possession of the unit to the Landlords on or after June 21, 2026. 5. This consent order resolves any and all issues with respect to the tenancy up to the date of the hearing. April 7, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Rachel Gibbons Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor, Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Antoine Adams and Marie Adams (the 'Tenants') because the Landlords require possession of the rental unit in order to demolish the unit. The Landlords also claimed compensation for each day the Tenants remained in the unit after the termination date. This application was heard by videoconference on March 26, 2026.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Rachel Gibbons

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Rent deposit