Case Study

Eviction — Damage to property · Brantford · LTB-L-009755-24

Ontario LTB order in Brantford · February 5, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: October 24, 2025

Order Issued: February 5, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-009755-24
Address: 30 HOLLINRAKE AVE, BRANTFORD, ON N3T0B6
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $2,344.30
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Damage to property
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 88.1, Section 89

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Antonina Capano and Arcangelo Capano
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Barbara Ann Draper
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Curtis Begg
Keywords: eviction, damage to property, interference with reasonable enjoyment, maintenance and repairs

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Damage to property — was granted.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated as of April 30, 2024. 2. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord $2,158.30, which represents the reasonable costs of repairing the damage and replacing the damaged property. 3. The Tenant shall also pay to the Landlord $186.00 for the cost of filing the application. 4. The total amount the Tenant must pay the Landlord is $2,344.30. 5. If the Tenant does not pay the Landlord the full amount owing on or before February 16, 2026, the Tenant will start to owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from February 17, 2026 at 4.00% annually on the balance outstanding. February 5, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Curtis Begg Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order requiring the Tenant to pay the Landlords’ reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that are the result of the Tenant's conduct or that of another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex. This conduct substantially interfered with the Landlord's reasonable enjoyment of the residential complex or another lawful right, privilege or interest. This application was heard by videoconference on October 24, 2025.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Curtis Begg

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Damage to property