Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · St Thomas · LTB-L-086490-25

Ontario LTB order in St Thomas · February 6, 2026 · Consent

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: February 3, 2026

Order Issued: February 6, 2026

Termination Date: March 31, 2026

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-086490-25
Address: 1-353 TALBOT ST, ST THOMAS, ON N5P1B7
Decision In Favor: Resolved by consent
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Bonyan LTD
Landlord Rep: Susana Pereira
Tenant: Samuel Heathorn
Tenant Rep: No Representative Listed
Adjudicator: Kyle McGraw
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was resolved by a consent order between the parties.

📑 Findings & determinations

it is ordered that: 1. The application is amended to remove Canadian Mental Health Association and Sandy Dobaczewski as Tenants. 2. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before March 31, 2026. 3. If the unit is not vacated on or before March 31, 2026, then starting April 1, 2026, the Landlord may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be enforced. File Number: LTB-L-086490-25 Order Page 2 of 2 4. Upon receipt of this order, the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) is directed to give vacant possession of the unit to the Landlord on or after April 1, 2026. February 6, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Kyle McGraw Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor, Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Samuel Heathorn (the 'Tenant') because: • the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date. This application was heard by videoconference on February 3, 2026.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Kyle McGraw

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment