Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · Brampton · LTB-L-088801-25

Ontario LTB order in Brampton · February 9, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: February 4, 2026

Order Issued: February 9, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-088801-25
Address: 109-5 KINGS CROSS RD, BRAMPTON, ON L6T3X6
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 78

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: CAPREIT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: LILIANA WILDER
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Lindsay Phomin
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

it is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant continues if the Tenant meets the conditions set out below. 2. On or before March 15, 2026, and for the duration of the tenancy, the Tenant shall ensure that the rental unit, including the balcony, is in a state of ordinary cleanliness, free from excessive items, clutter and garbage. 3. If the Tenant fails to comply with the conditions set out in paragraph 2 of this order, the Landlord may apply under section 78 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the ‘Act') for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant. The Landlord must make the application within 30 days of a breach of a condition. This application is made to the LTB without notice to the Tenant. 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict LILIANA WILDER (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant This application was scheduled to be heard by videoconference on February 4, 2026. Instead, the Landlord's Agent Mehul Jani, the Landlord's Legal Representative Geoff Paine and the Tenant, who had consulted with Tenant Duty Counsel, participated in a mediation session. Parties reached an agreement and requested an order on consent to resolve the application. On consent of the parties,
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Lindsay Phomin

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment