Case Study

Eviction — Damage to property · Brampton · LTB-L-088935-25

Ontario LTB order in Brampton · February 18, 2026 · Consent

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: February 4, 2026

Order Issued: February 18, 2026

Termination Date: June 30, 2026

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-088935-25
Address: 488 MAIN ST N, BRAMPTON, ON L6V1P9
Amount Awarded: $15,000.00
Decision In Favor: Resolved by consent
Application Type: Eviction — Damage to property
RTA Sections: Section 69

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: 1001117058 Ontario Inc.
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Audrey Payne and Linda Gardener
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Nersi Makki
Keywords: eviction, damage to property, rent deposit

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Damage to property — was resolved by a consent order between the parties.

📑 Findings & determinations

it is ordered that: 1. The application and style of cause are amended to correct the second- named respondent who is Linda Payne. 2. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before June 30, 2026. 3. The Landlord forgives and waives the rent owing for the period February 1, 2026 to May 31, 2026. 4. On or before May 1, 2026, the Landlord shall pay the Tenants $15,000.00 in certified funds. 5. If the unit is not vacated on or before June 30, 2026, then starting July 1, 2026, the Landlord may file this order with the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) so that the eviction may be enforced. 6. Upon receipt of this order, the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) is directed to give vacant possession of the unit to the Landlord on or after July 1, 2026. February 18, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Nersi Makki Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor, Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Audrey Payne and Linda Gardener (the 'Tenant') because: • the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has wilfully caused undue damage to the premises; • the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex used the rental unit or the residential complex in a manner that is inconsistent with use as a residential premises and that has caused or can be expected to cause significant damage. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date. This application was heard by videoconference on February 4, 2026.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Nersi Makki

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Damage to property