Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · Thorold · LTB-L-089485-25

Ontario LTB order in Thorold · February 5, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: February 4, 2026

Order Issued: February 5, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-089485-25
Address: 72 CONCORD DR, THOROLD, ON L2V0K8
Amount Awarded: $3,082.58
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 78

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: GURSIMRAN SINGH DHINDSA
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: ANNA JITUSKA SMAHEL
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Lindsay Phomin
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

it is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant continues if the Tenant meets the conditions set out below. 2. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord $3,082.58 for the outs tanding utilities, hot water tank rental and the application filing fee. 3. The Tenant shall pay the amount listed in paragraph 2 as follows: • $2,800.00 on or before February 27, 2026 • $282.58 on or before March 20, 2026 4. If the Tenant fails to comply with the conditions set out in paragraph 3 of this order, the Landlord may apply under section 78 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the ‘Act') for File Number: LTB-L-089485- 25 Order Page 2 of 2 an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant. The Landlord must make the application within 30 days of a breach of a condition. This application is made to the LTB without notice to the Tenant. February 5, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Lindsay Phomin Hearings Officer, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor, Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order requiring ANNA JITUSKA SMAHEL (the 'Tenant') to pay the Landlord's reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that are the result of the Tenant's failure to pay utility costs they were required to pay under the terms of the tenancy agreement. This application was scheduled to be heard by videoconference on February 4, 2026. Instead, the Landlord's Legal Representative Vishodhana Sivanesarajah and the Tenant’s sister and representative Gigi Trudel participated in a mediation session. Parties reached an agreement and requested an order on consent to resolve the application. On consent of the parties,
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Lindsay Phomin

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment