Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · Stratford · LTB-L-090141-25

Ontario LTB order in Stratford · January 12, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: January 7, 2026

Order Issued: January 12, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-090141-25
Address: unit 4-3192 VIVIAN LINE 37, STRATFORD, ON N5A0J8
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 78

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Byron Lindner
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Anita Russel and Cheryl Currie
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Jane Dean
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

it is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenants continues if the Tenants meet the conditions set out below. 2. On or before February 1, 2026, the Tenants shall ensure only one dog, that dog being a cross-breed Bulldog/Chocolate Lab named “Bear”, shall reside in the rental unit. 3. If the Tenants fail to comply with the conditions set out in paragraph 2 of this order, the Landlord may apply under section 78 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the ‘Act') for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenants. The Landlord must make the application within 30 days of a breach of a condition. This application is made to the LTB without notice to the Tenants. File Number: LTB-L-090141-25 Order Page 2 of 2 January 12, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Jane Dean Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Anita Russel and Cheryl Currie (the 'Tenants') because the Tenants, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenants permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant This application was heard by videoconference on January 7, 2026.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Jane Dean

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment