Case Study

Eviction — Persistent late payment · Toronto · LTB-L-091180-25

Ontario LTB order in Toronto · January 9, 2026 · Consent

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: January 6, 2026

Order Issued: January 9, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-091180-25
Address: 1216-35 THORNCLIFFE PARK DR, TORONTO, ON M4H1J3
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $146.38
Decision In Favor: Resolved by consent
Application Type: Eviction — Persistent late payment
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 78

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Morguard Corporation
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Raimonda Ali
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Sonja Hudson
Keywords: eviction, persistent late payment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Persistent late payment — was resolved by a consent order between the parties.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

it is ordered that: 1. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord the lawful rent on time and in full as it comes due and owing for a 12-month period starting February 1, 2026, through to and including January 1, 2027. 2. If the Tenant fails to make any of the payments noted in paragraph 1 of this order the Landlord may, without notice to the Tenant, apply to the Landlord and Tenant Board within 30 days of the Tenant’s breach pursuant to section 78 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, (the ‘Act’) for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant. File Number: LTB-L-091180-25 Order Page 2 of 2 3. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord $146.38, which represents the remainder of the filing fee, on or before January 9, 2026. January 9, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Sonja Hudson Hearings Officer, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Raimonda Ali (the 'Tenant') because: • the Tenant has been persistently late in paying the Tenant’s rent. The Landlord also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date. This application was heard by videoconference on January 6, 2026.

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Sonja Hudson

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Persistent late payment