Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · Windsor · LTB-L-091206-25

Ontario LTB order in Windsor · February 11, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: February 4, 2026

Order Issued: February 11, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-091206-25
Address: 116-333 GLENGARRY AVE, WINDSOR, ON N9A1P6
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 78

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Windsor Essex Community Housing Corporation
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: CJ Duquette
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Lindsay Phomin
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

it is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant continues if the Tenant meets the conditions set out below. 2. The Tenant shall maintain a clear path of egress throughout the unit ensuring that t he front and interior doors are able to fully open without obstruction. 3. The Tenant another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex shall not tamper with the fire safety equipment in the unit. 4. If the Tenant fails to comply with the conditions set out in paragraph 3 of this order, the Landlord may apply under section 78 of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the ‘Act') for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant. The Landlord must make the application within 30 days of a breach of a condition. This application is made to the LTB without notice to the Tenant. February 11, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Lindsay Phomin Hearings Officer, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor, Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict CJ Duquette (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the r esidential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant. This application was scheduled to be heard by videoconference on February 4, 2026. Instead, the Landlord's Legal Representative Madeline Whitworth and the Tenant's Legal Representative Tori- Lee Jenkins engaged in private settlement discussions. On consent of the parties,
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Lindsay Phomin

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment