Eviction for non-payment of rent · London · LTB-L-091235-25

This Landlord application — Eviction for non-payment of rent — was resolved by a consent order between the parties.

It is ordered on consent that: 1. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord $2,153.52 for arrears of rent up to January 31, 2026, and costs. 2. The Tenant shall pay to the Landlord the amount set out in paragraph 1 in accordance with the following schedule: a) $541.00 on or before January 20, 2026. The Tenant claims to have made this payment already, but the Landlord is not yet able to confirm receipt. b) $541.00 on or before February 20, 2026. c) $541.00 on or before March 20, 2026. d) $530.52 on or before April 20, 2026. 3. Starting on February 1 2026, the Tenant shall pay the lawful monthly rent that becomes due while the arrears are outstanding no later than the first day of the month for which the rent is due. File Number: LTB-L-091235-25 Order Page 2 of 2 4. If the Tenant fails to make any one of the payments in accordance with this order, the outstanding balance of any arrears of rent and costs to be paid by the Tenant to the Landlord pursuant to paragraph 1 of this order shall become immediately due and owing and the Landlord may, without notice to the Tenant, apply to the LTB within 30 days of the Tenant's breach pursuant to section 78 of the Act for an order terminating the tenancy and evicting the Tenant and requiring that the Tenant pay any new arrears, NSF fees and related charges that became owing after January 31, 2026. January 21, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Isabelle Bouvier Hearings Officer, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Rhonda Loker (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant did not pay the rent that the Tenant owes. The application was scheduled to be heard by videoconference on January 15, 2026. The Landlord’s representative Anita Sada and the Tenant Rhonda Loker, accompanied by Heather Clarke, engaged in private settlement discussions and advised that the parties had reached an agreement. The parties mutually agreed to resolve all matters at issue in the application and requested an order on consent. After reviewing the terms, I was satisfied that the parties understood the consequences of the order on consent. I did not determine the application on its merits.