Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · Brampton · LTB-L-092301-25

Ontario LTB order in Brampton · March 2, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: February 9, 2026

Order Issued: March 2, 2026

Termination Date: March 13, 2026

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-092301-25
Address: 26 MONTPELIER ST, BRAMPTON, ON L6Y6A6
Form Used: N5
Amount Awarded: $3,321.26
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections: Section 69, Section 88.2, Section 83

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: HANY GIRGIS and MAHA GIRGIS
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: JAMIE KYDD
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Curtis Smith
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1.T he tenancy between the Landlords and the Tenant is terminated. The Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before March 13, 2026. 2.The Tenant shall pay to the Landlords $3,135.26, which represents the reasonable out-of- pocket expenses the Landlords have incurred or will incur as a result of the unpaid utility costs. 3.The Tenant shall also pay to the Landlords $186.00 for the cost of filing the application. 4.The total amount the Tenants must pay the Landlords is $3,321.26. 5.If the Tenant does not pay the Landlords the full amount owing on or before March 13, 2026, the Tenant will start to owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from March 14, 2026 at 4.00% annually on the balance outstanding. March 2, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Curtis Smith Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict JAMIE KYDD (the 'Tenant') because: • the Tenant, another occupant of the rental unit or someone the Tenant permitted in the residential complex has substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment or lawful right, privilege or interest of the Landlord or another tenant The Landlords also claimed compensation for each day the Tenant remained in the unit after the termination date. The Landlords als o applied for an order requiring the T enant to pay the Landlords’ reasonable out-of-pocket expenses that are the result of the Tenant's failure to pay utility costs they were required to pay under the terms of the tenancy agreement. This application was heard by videoconference on February 9, 2026.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Curtis Smith

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment