Case Study

LTB Decision on Damage to Property and Eviction Claim

Case LTB-L-022265-22 - Serge Gelly vs. Alphose Amuzati

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Date not provided

Hearing Date: 2023-03-08

Order Issued: 2023-03-22

Termination Date: Not specified

Eviction Deadline: Date not provided

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-022265-22
Address: 1-2, 324 CUMBERLAND AVE HAMILTON ON L8M2A1
Form Used: N5 Notice to End your Tenancy for Interfering with Others, Damage or Overcrowding
Served By: Not specified
Amount Awarded: $0
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Eviction for damage to property
RTA Sections: Section 62, Section 83(1)(a), Section 83(2), Section 89(1), Section 204(1), Section 78

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Serge Gelly
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Alphose Amuzati
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Not specified
Keywords: eviction, damage, repair, compensation, grass

⚖️ Decision summary

Eviction request denied based on evidence of repair and minimal damage.
Conditional terms set to prevent future damage.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Tenant's vehicle damaged the front yard grass.
Landlord and Tenant both claimed to have repaired the damage.

📑 Findings & determinations

Damage was caused by Tenant or associated occupant.
No costs awarded due to mutual repair and lack of incurred expenses.

💡 Summary points

Landlord applied for eviction based on damage caused by Tenant's vehicle to the front yard.
Both parties repaired the damage, leading to no costs awarded for repairs.
Eviction denied, conditional on no further damage by parking on the yard.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Not specified

📂 Related by application type

Eviction for damage to property