Eviction for non-payment of rent · Toronto · LTB-L-096197-25

This Landlord application — Eviction for non-payment of rent — was granted.

it is ordered that: 1. The tenancy between the Landlord and the Tenant is terminated unless the Tenant voids this order. 2. The Tenant may void this order and continue the tenancy by paying to the Landlord or to the LTB in trust: • $3,792.48 if the payment is made on or before February 28, 2026. See Schedule 1 for the calculation of the amount owing. 3. The Tenant may also make a motion at the LTB to void this order under section 74(11) of the Act, if the Tenant has paid the full amount owing as ordered plus any additional rent that became due after February 28, 2026 but before the Court Enforcement Office (Sheriff) enforces the eviction. The Tenant may only make this motion once during the tenancy. 4. If the Tenant does not pay the amount required to void this order the Tenant must move out of the rental unit on or before February 28, 2026. 5. As of the date of the hearing, the amount of the rent deposit and interest the Landlord owes on the rent deposit exceeds the arrears of rent, compensation and the cost of filing the application the Landlord is entitled to by $65.21. See Schedule 1 for the calculation of the amount owing. However, the Landlord is authorized to deduct from the amount owing to the Tenant $68.49 per day for compensation for the use of the unit starting February 6, 2026 until the date the Tenant moves out of the unit. 6. The Landlord or the Tenant shall pay to the other any sum of money that is owed as a result of this order. 7. If the unit is not vacated on or before February 28, 2026, then starting March 1, 2026, the Landlord may file this order with th...

applied for an order to terminate the tenancy and evict Samuel Baidoo (the 'Tenant') because the Tenant did not pay the rent that the Tenant owes. The application was scheduled to be heard by videoconference on February 5, 2026. The Landlord’s representative Heather Butt and the Tenant Samuel Baidoo engaged in private settlement discussions and advised that the parties had reached an agreement. The parties mutually agreed to resolve all matters at issue in the application and requested an order on consent. After reviewing the terms, I was satisfied that the parties understood the consequences of the order on consent. I did not determine the application on its merits.