Case Study

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment · Toronto · LTB-L-097409-24

Ontario LTB order in Toronto · May 22, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: April 15, 2026

Order Issued: May 22, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-097409-24
Address: 409-80 GUESTVILLE AVE, Toronto, ON M6N4N3
Form Used: N13
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment
RTA Sections:

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Guestville Apartments Inc. and Michael Klein
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Pamelia Watt
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator:
Keywords: eviction, interference with reasonable enjoyment, harassment, illegal entry, withholding vital services, bad faith notice

⚖️ Decision summary

This Landlord application — Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment — was granted.

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: File Number: LTB-L-097409-24-IN3-AM et al. Order Page 12 of 14 1. The hearing is adjourned to July 28, 29, and 30, 2026. I am seized. 2. On or before May 15, 2026, the Tenants shall amend their T2 application in accordance with paragraphs 12, 16, and 21 above. 3. The Landlords shall perform a keyword search to identify all communications (text messages, emails, WhatsApp messages, etc.) sent from or to employees of the corporate Landlord, Michael Klein, Ludmila Karakulov, or Shaya Klein between June 28, 2023 and May 29, 2025 which contain any of the following phrases or names: “union,” “association,” “tenant meeting,” “80 Guestville Tenant Association,” “York South-Weston Tenant Union,” “York South Weston Tenant Union,” “YSW,” “ACORN,” “Chiara Padovani,” “N13s,” “renoviction,” “under-market rent,” “undermarket rent,” and the names of the Tenants as set out in this order’s style of cause. 4. On or before June 17, 2026, the Landlords shall give the Tenants the following documents: a) Copies of all communications identified in paragraph 3, above, which are arguably relevant and not privileged; b) A list of all other communications identified in paragraph 3, stating the reason the Landlords assert that each communication is privileged or not arguably relevant; c) A list of all N13 notices served in residential complexes in Ontario for which Michael Klein is a director, officer, or beneficial owner; d) For five sample properties/corporations (250 Frederick Inc. 94 Beck Inc., Lindsay Apartments Inc., Melvin Apartments Inc., and Dawes Apartments Inc.), one file...
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

📂 Related by application type

Eviction — Interference with reasonable enjoyment