Case Study

Tenant rights application · Hamilton · LTB-T-084420-24

Ontario LTB order in Hamilton · January 9, 2026 · Consent

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: December 10, 2025

Order Issued: January 9, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-084420-24
Address: Unit 1-58 ARTHUR AVE N, HAMILTON, ON L8L6C5
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $258.00
Decision In Favor: Resolved by consent
Application Type: Tenant rights application
RTA Sections: Section 31

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: ASHLEY NEUFELD, Rise Property Solutions Inc. and SHEFALI PANDEY
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: VICTORIA IRO
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Shadiyah Stoute
Keywords: interference with reasonable enjoyment

⚖️ Decision summary

This Tenant application — Tenant rights application — was resolved by a consent order between the parties.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered on consent of the parties that: 1. The total amount the Landlord shall pay the Tenant is $258.00. This amount includes reasonable out-of-pocket expenses the Tenant incurred and the cost of filing the application. 2. The Landlord shall pay the Tenant the full amount owing in paragraph 1 by January 10, 2026. 3. If the Landlord does not pay the Tenant the full amount owing by January 10, 2026, the Landlord will owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from January 11, 2026 at 4.00% annually on the balance outstanding. 4. This order on consent is in full and final settlement of this application. File Number: LTB-T-084420-24 Order Page 2 of 2 January 9, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Shadiyah Stoute Hearings Officer, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order determining that ASHLEY NEUFELD, Rise Property Solutions Inc. and SHEFALI PANDEY (the 'Landlord'): • substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of their household. This application was scheduled to be heard by videoconference on December 10, 2025. The Landlord and the Tenant attended the hearing. The Landlord's Legal Representative, Sabrina Marchionne, and the Tenant engaged in private settlement discussions. The parties reached an agreement and requested an order on consent to resolve the application. I was satisfied that the parties understood the terms and consequences of their consent.

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Shadiyah Stoute

📂 Related by application type

Tenant rights application