Case Study

Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs · Toronto · LTB-T-086077-25

Ontario LTB order in Toronto · March 26, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: Not Available

Order Issued: March 26, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-086077-25
Address: 4-43 TWENTY SECOND ST, ETOBICOKE, ON M8V3M2
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $48.00
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs
RTA Sections: Section 30

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: boguslaw MIKE KOTOWSKI
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: SEAN persaud
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Nersi Makki
Keywords: maintenance and repairs

⚖️ Decision summary

This Tenant application — Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs — was granted.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The Landlord shall ke ep the driveway free of overgrown weeds. File Number: LTB-T-086077- 25 Order Page 2 of 2 2. The Landlord shall ensure that snow is clear and removed in order to allow unimpeded access from the parking area to the entrance of the rental unit. 3. The Landlord shall pay the Tenant is $48.00 representing the cost of filing the application. 4. The Landlord shall pay the Tenant the full amount owing by April 6, 2026. 5. If the Landlord does not pay the Tenant the full amount owing by April 6, 2026, the Landlord will owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from April 7, 2026 at 4.00% annually on the balance outstanding. March 26, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Nersi Makki Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order determining that Boguslaw Mike Kotowski (the 'Landlord') failed to meet the Landlord's maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act') or failed to comply with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards. This application came before me for a mandatory adjudicative case conference in videoconference 144 on March 17, 2026. Only the Tenant attended the hearing. As of 11:31 am, the Landlord was not present or represented at the hearing although properly served with notice of this hearing by the LTB. There was no record of a request to adjourn the hearing. As a result, the hearing proceeded with only the Tenant's evidence.

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Nersi Makki

📂 Related by application type

Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs