Case Study

Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs · Vaughan · LTB-T-086250-25

Ontario LTB order in Vaughan · May 29, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: Not Available

Order Issued: May 29, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-086250-25
Address: 1810-7 Townsgate Drive, Vaughan, ON L4J7Z9
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $33,000.00
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs
RTA Sections: Section 30

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Genia Maizlin
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Maryam Motamedy, Hamed motamedi, zahra abolmasoumi and mohammad motamdei
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Rachel Gibbons
Keywords: maintenance and repairs

⚖️ Decision summary

This Tenant application — Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs — was granted.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The Landlord shall pay the Tenants $628.81. This amount represents: • $580.81 for a rent abatement • $48.00 for the cost of filing the application. 2. The Landlord shall pay the Tenants the full amount owing by June 9, 2026. 3. If the Landlord does not pay the Tenants the full amount owing by June 9, 2026, the Landlord will owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from June 10, 2026 at 4.00% annually on the balance outstanding. May 29, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Rachel Gibbons Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order determining that Genia Maizlin (the 'Landlord') failed to meet the Landlord's maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act') or failed to comply with health, safety, housing or maintenance standards. An Adjudicative Case Conference (‘ACC’) was held by videoconference on May 20, 2026. Only the Tenants, Maryam Motamedy (‘MM’) and Hamed Motamedi (‘HM’), attended the ACC. As of 10:48 a.m., the Landlord was not present or represented at the ACC although properly served with notice of this ACC by the LTB. There was no record of a request to adjourn the ACC. As a result, the application proceeded to an uncontested hearing with only the Tenants' evidence.

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Rachel Gibbons

📂 Related by application type

Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs