Case Study

Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs · Toronto · LTB-T-089334-25

Ontario LTB order in Toronto · April 7, 2026 · Consent

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: Not Available

Order Issued: April 7, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-089334-25
Address: 2812-33 Singer, North York, ON M2K0B4
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $800.00
Decision In Favor: Resolved by consent
Application Type: Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs
RTA Sections: Section 69

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Xing Yue Liu
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Amirhossein Rampour
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator:
Keywords: maintenance and repairs

⚖️ Decision summary

This Tenant application — Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs — was resolved by a consent order between the parties.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered on consent that: 1. The Landlord shall pay the Tenant $800.00 in full and final satisfaction of all claims raised in the application as follows: (a) $400.00 on or before April 1, 2026; and (b) $400.00 on or before May 1, 2026. File Number: LTB-T-089334- 25-AM Order Page 2 of 2 2. This order resolves all issues raised in the application to the date of the hearing. March 24, 2026 Date Order Issued ____________________________ April 7, 2026 Nersi Makki Date Order Amended Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order determining that the Xing Yue Liu (the ‘Landlord’) failed to meet the Landlord’s maintenance obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006 (the 'Act'). This application came before me for a mandatory adjudicative case conference in videoconference 144 on March 17, 2026. The Tenant and the Landlord attended the case conference. At the case conference, the parties advised that they had resolved their dispute and requested the following order on consent. I was satisfied that the parties understood the consequences of their joint submissions.

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

📂 Related by application type

Tenant application — Maintenance and repairs