Case Study

Tenant application — Harassment · Cambridge · LTB-T-092678-25

Ontario LTB order in Cambridge · May 15, 2026 · Consent

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: May 12, 2026

Order Issued: May 15, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-092678-25
Address: 77 ABBOTT CRES, CAMBRIDGE, ON N3C0C9
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $14,000.00
Decision In Favor: Resolved by consent
Application Type: Tenant application — Harassment
RTA Sections: Section 57

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Manish Gupta, Mehar Gupta and KSDM Holdings Inc.
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Robin Evans
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Ilan Shingait
Keywords: harassment, bad faith notice, illegal charges

⚖️ Decision summary

This Tenant application — Tenant application — Harassment — was resolved by a consent order between the parties.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered on consent that: 1. On or before May 15, 2026, the Landlord shall pay to the Tenant the full amount of $14,000.00 as full and final settlement of the Tenant ’s applications. 2. If the Landlord does not pay the Tenant the full amount owing by May 15, 202 6, the Landlord will owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from May 16, 2026, at 4.00% annually on the balance outstanding. 3. This order resolves all issues arising from this residential tenancy. File Number: LTB-T-041989- 25 Order Page 2 of 2 May 15, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Ilan Shingait Member, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order determining that Manish Gupta (the 'Landlord'): • collected or retained money illegally (T1 Application). • harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant (T2 Application). • gave a notice of termination in bad faith (T5 Application). The applications were heard by videoconference on May 12, 2026. The Landlord and the Landlord’ s Representative, Janet Van Oordt and the Tenant and the Tenant’s Representative, Marvin Dillon attended the hearing. At the hearing, the parties consented to the following order in full and final settlement of the Tenant’s applications and all issues arising from this residential tenancy (T1, T2, and T5).

Share this case

🏷️ Related by keywords

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Ilan Shingait

📂 Related by application type

Tenant application — Harassment