Case Study

Tenant application — Harassment · Toronto · LTB-T-100294-25

Ontario LTB order in Toronto · February 24, 2026 · Granted

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: Not Available

Hearing Date: December 15, 2025

Order Issued: February 24, 2026

Termination Date: Not Available

Eviction Deadline: Not Available

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-T-100294-25
Address: 704-75 Cosburn Avenue, Toronto, ON M4K2G1
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded: $750.00
Decision In Favor: Tenant
Application Type: Tenant application — Harassment
RTA Sections: Section 31

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: 75 Cosburn Apts
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Evagelos Madzavrakos and George Terzis
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator:
Keywords: interference with reasonable enjoyment, harassment, illegal entry, withholding vital services

⚖️ Decision summary

This Tenant application — Tenant application — Harassment — was granted.

⚠️ Dispute summary

📑 Findings & determinations

It is ordered that: 1. The total amount the Landlord shall pay the Tenant is $750 .00. This amount represents: 2. $750.00 for the estimated costs to replace the sofa. 3. The Landlord shall pay the Tenant the full amount owing by March 7, 2026. 4. If the Landlord does not pay the Tenant the full amount owing by March 7 , 2026, the Landlord will owe interest. This will be simple interest calculated from March 8, 2026 at 4.00% annually on the balance outstanding. 5. If the Landlord does not pay the full amount owing my March 7 , 2026, then commencing April 1, 2026 that Tenant shall be permitted to deduct the full amount from the lawful rent, until the full amount has been recovered. February 24, 2026 ____________________________ Date Issued Robert Patchett Vice Chair, Landlord and Tenant Board 15 Grosvenor Street, Ground Floor Toronto ON M7A 2G6

💡 Summary points

applied for an order determining that 75 Cosburn Apts (the 'Landlord'): • entered the rental unit illegally. • altered the locking system on a door giving entry to the rental unit or residential complex without giving the Tenant replacement keys. • substantially interfered with the reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit or residential complex by the Tenant or by a member of their household. • harassed, obstructed, coerced, threatened or interfered with the Tenant. • withheld or interfered with their vital services or care services and meals in a care home. This application was heard by videoconference on December 15, 2025.

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

📂 Related by application type

Tenant application — Harassment