Case Study

Tran v Grandmond – LTB Order LTB-L-003758-23 | Belleville Rent Arrears & Damage Ruling

Ontario LTB orders tenants to pay $21,063.64 for rent arrears, property damage, and unpaid utilities at upper unit, 15 Pearl St, Belleville

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: January 12, 2023

Hearing Date: November 4, 2024

Order Issued: January 3, 2025

Termination Date: March 31, 2023

Eviction Deadline: N/A – Tenants already vacated March 31, 2023

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-003758-23
Address: Upper Unit, 15 Pearl St, Belleville ON K8N4X1
Form Used: N5
Served By: Landlord (Van Tran)
Amount Awarded: $21,063.64
Decision In Favor: Landlord
Application Type: Rent arrears, property damage compensation, unpaid utilities, and eviction (L1/L2 applications)
RTA Sections: Section 87(1) – Landlord application for rent arrears, Section 88.2 – Landlord application for unpaid utility costs, Section 89 – Landlord application for compensation for damage, Section 62(3) – Voiding an N5 notice of termination, Section 201(1)(f) – Board power to amend an application, Section 2(1) – Definition of utilities (heat, electricity, water), LTB Rule of Procedure 15 / Rule 15.4 – Amendment of applications

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Van Tran
Landlord Rep: Dara Saunders, Licensed Paralegal
Tenant: Morris Jonathan Grandmond, Kaylee Mclaughlin
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Greg Witt
Keywords: rent arrears, property damage, unpaid utilities, N5 notice, bathtub overflow, negligent damage, utility ledger, eviction, L1 application, L2 application, L9 application

⚖️ Decision summary

Total judgment of $21,063.64 ordered against the Tenants.
Payment deadline set for January 14, 2025; simple interest at 6.00% annually accrues from January 15, 2025 on any outstanding balance.
Rent deposit of $1,650.00 and $22.00 interest credited against rent arrears award.
No eviction order issued as Tenants had already vacated the unit on March 31, 2023.

⚠️ Dispute summary

Landlord filed L1 (rent arrears) and L2 (substantial interference, property damage, unpaid utilities) applications in January 2023.
Tenants vacated the unit on March 31, 2023; applications were amended accordingly to seek monetary compensation only.
Landlord's N5 notice dated December 4, 2022 cited ceiling damage and unpaid utilities; Tenants did not void the notice within seven days.
Tenants did not comply with an interim order requiring disclosure by May 31, 2024, and did not attend the hearing.
Board granted Landlord's request to amend the L2 application to include unpaid utility claims for July 2022 to March 2023.

📑 Findings & determinations

Rent arrears of $14,100.00 were established for September 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023 at $2,350.00/month; rent deposit of $1,650.00 plus $22.00 interest was deducted, leaving $12,614.00 including the $186.00 filing fee.
Tenant negligently caused undue damage (bathtub overflow damaging downstairs ceiling and bathtub area); Landlord incurred $5,086.05 in repair costs per Cruikshank Home Renovations invoice dated November 16, 2022; awarded $5,068.05.
Tenant owed 65% of heat, hydro, and water bills per lease: hydro $1,879.61, heat $674.46, water $827.52, totalling $3,381.59; awarded in full.
Claims for internet and phone costs dismissed — not defined as utilities under s.2(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
L2 application amendment granted under s.201(1)(f) of the Act as the utility claim was not new and Tenants had prior notice via February 24, 2024 email.

💡 Summary points

Tenants failed to pay rent from September 1, 2022 to March 31, 2023, accumulating $14,100.00 in arrears.
Tenants negligently caused water damage by allowing the bathtub to overflow while bathing children, resulting in $5,068.00 in repair costs.
Tenants failed to pay their 65% share of heat, hydro, and water utilities from July 2022 to March 2023, totalling $3,381.59.
Tenants did not appear at the November 4, 2024 hearing despite proper notice and failed to comply with an interim disclosure order.
Internet and phone costs were dismissed as they do not qualify as utilities under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case

🧑‍⚖️ Same adjudicator

Greg Witt