Case Study

LTB Interim Order – Review of Ex Parte Eviction Order | Courtice ON | LTB-L-064032-25-SA-RV-IN

Landlord Salekur Rahman requests review of motion order; LTB directs matter to review hearing at 667 Townline Rd N, Courtice

🕑 Case timeline

Application Date: September 22, 2025 (review request filed)

Hearing Date: To be scheduled by LTB

Order Issued: September 22, 2025

Termination Date:

Eviction Deadline:

ℹ️ Case overview

Case Number: LTB-L-064032-25-SA-RV-IN
Address: 667 Townline Rd N, Courtice ON L1E2J4
Form Used:
Served By:
Amount Awarded:
Decision In Favor: Interim — matter directed to review hearing
Application Type: Review of motion order setting aside ex parte eviction order
RTA Sections: Section 21.2 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, Residential Tenancies Act, 2006, Rule 19.7 (LTB Rules of Practice – disclosure)

👥 Parties involved

Landlord: Salekur Rahman
Landlord Rep: Self Represented
Tenant: Alanna Mariah Helen McKeown, Jason John Miller
Tenant Rep: Self Represented
Adjudicator: Harry Cho, Vice Chair
Keywords: review request, ex parte order, set aside, interim order, motion proceeding, Section 21.2 SPPA, Residential Tenancies Act 2006

⚖️ Decision summary

The LTB issued an Interim Order scheduling a review hearing of the Landlord's request.
Both parties are directed to attend and be prepared to proceed on the merits of the original application if the review is granted.
All evidence must be disclosed to the other party and the LTB no later than seven days before the hearing.
Material may be filed with the LTB via the Tribunals Ontario Portal (TOP) or by email at [email protected].
Failure to comply with disclosure obligations under Rule 19.7 may result in evidence being excluded.

⚠️ Dispute summary

An ex parte eviction order (LTB-L-064032-25) was issued on August 11, 2025 against tenants Alanna McKeown and Jason Miller at 667 Townline Rd N, Courtice.
Tenants filed a motion to set aside the ex parte order; a motion order (LTB-L-064032-25-SA) was issued on September 15, 2025.
Landlord Salekur Rahman requested a review of that motion order on September 22, 2025, potentially on the basis that he was not reasonably able to participate in the motion proceeding.

📑 Findings & determinations

The matter is directed to a review hearing to assess whether the Landlord was reasonably able to participate in the motion proceeding and any other relevant matters.
If the review is granted, the Board will hear the merits of the Tenant's motion to set aside the original ex parte order LTB-L-064032-25.
Non-attendance by the Landlord at the review hearing may be considered an abuse of process and may result in costs awarded against the Landlord.

💡 Summary points

On September 22, 2025, Landlord Salekur Rahman requested a review of motion order LTB-L-064032-25-SA issued September 15, 2025.
The LTB directed the matter to a review hearing to determine whether the review request should be granted or denied.
If the review is granted, a new hearing will be held on the merits of the Tenant's motion to set aside ex parte order LTB-L-064032-25 issued August 11, 2025.
Both parties must disclose all evidence to each other and to the LTB at least seven days before the hearing.
Failure by the Landlord to attend the review hearing may be treated as an abuse of process and result in a costs order.
📄 View Official PDF

Share this case